Paine and the blog
There is no question that new media is a concept that with each emerging media there has been a new level. You could also possibly say that even with significant events throughout American history there has been a change in each of those medias. Yes, journalism and media witnesses significant changed on September 11th. But prior to that, during the first gulf war we witnessed significant change in new media. It was the first time we witnessed conflict as it happened and ultimately witnessed a war up close. This was not the first conflict documented but it was done with incredible real-time effect. I remember witnessing and tracking the missile that had been equip with cameras, and the missile that had been launched between warring nations. Also, I do not believe that the government had ever been as forward about wartime information as they had been with this war. The Clinton impeachment and also subsequently the Bush elections saw an increased number of individuals that openly discussed and had dialoged the events with possibly an attempt to change public sentiment even though many had convincingly made up their minds prior to any outcomes.
The author is accurate in the assumptions that free press/speech was and is key in ascertaining real democracy. Ironically, when mentioning different details of free speech and the early press medium the author did not mention any major patrons of civil rights. Many used the literary medium as the conscience voice that would impact a nation, such individuals as William Lloyd Garrison. Garrison, an outraged and outspoken champion, among those early on that would seriously challenge the constitution and its symbolism when denied this expression and appalled at the current conditions that was affecting American society. . The Afro-American Newspaper was founded in 1892, by former slave John H. Murphy. Interesting is the fact that the author mentions many of these aspects that primarily predominantly affected these same people.
A.J. Liebling’s admonition, that freedom of the press is for those people who own the press, ideally reflects more than a financial reality but simply back to the haves and have-not, as it has been in most medias.
It was interesting to be reminded that big business conglomerates didn’t really start in the 1980’s and that it has been ongoing since medias early beginnings. It has seen periods of significant and not so significant periods of consolidation. We are currently witnessing that in this current time. Or also, the global impact that the internet and the initial principles that help incorporate the web and its many uses, emails and its connectivity, blogging and its expansiveness as a e tool of the print medium.
However, it, I assume of the subject of how 9/11 changed virtually everything is interesting to see everyone’s different perspectives of now the news first arrived with them and how they all now view the news in a different capacity. As someone who was gazed upon the tower earlier that fateful day and as a resident of Washington, DC who was awaking as many were with a phone call stating “turn on the news”, see the second plane and hearing the boom and scramble of jets from Andrews AFB. Everyone engagement with news changed, whether for the good, bad or indifferent. At one point I couldn’t get information fast enough then simultaneously instant overload. The news was almost too much to bear. I had just quit my job less than two weeks prior, and was currently in the process of moving to New York so although I lost no family or friends, this was detrimental to me as well. Being in NY during the recovery, having to ride the subway afterwards, seeing the lights and night knowing that those lights were looking for people in the recovery and still, to know that yeah media changed but so did a lot of things.
See “government terror level watch” on Fox's news ticker.
